Showing posts with label Explorers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Explorers. Show all posts

Friday, May 17, 2013

Callaway Family

Early Callaway history is unclear.  Records indicate a William Callaway died in VA in 1642.We are interested in the story of the Joseph Callaway (1680-1732) and his family.  Joseph settled in Caroline County and had seven sons and two daughters.  The father, mother and a brother died of fever in a short period of time. The remaining family continued several years to live in the old homestead and then sold out and about 1740 settled in Brunswick County (the portion which ultimately became Bedford), locating on Big Otter River at the Eastern base of the Peaks of Otter. When the French and Indian War broke out in 1754 the country had become considerably populated and the people collected in forts which Washington occasionally visited. Three of the Calloway brothers held the commission of Captain, Thomas at Hickey's Fort, William at Pig River Fort and Richard at Blackwater Fort. The frontiers were constantly alarmed, marauding parties frequently pursued, and were sometimes overtaken and punished. For services in these engagements Richard and William were promoted to rank of Bedford Militia Colonels.

http://mediasvc.ancestry.com/image/d3a7c3e8-4e26-48bc-8380-2e456ee4c6ab.jpg?Client=Trees&NamespaceID=1093
Colonel William Callaway
Our seventh great grand uncle.
William Callaway was the second son of Joseph and Catherine Ann (Browning) Callaway. He was born in 1714, probably in Caroline County, Virginia and became a prominent and wealthy land owner of that State, as he patented fifteen thousand acres of land in Lunenburg, Brunswick, Bedford, and Halifax Counties. William commanded militia in the French and Indian Wars that were waged between 1755, and 1761. He was commissioned a Colonel during his service, and also participated in the American Revolutionary War. He later presided at the first court held in Bedford County, but this was just the beginning of his civil service, because William remained in the Virginia House of Burgesses for thirteen sessions. In 1754, William Callaway, Gentleman, made a free gift of one hundred acres of land to the newly formed County of Bedford to be developed into a town called New London, the county seat. William first married on January 8, 1735, to Elizabeth Tilley, and after her death he married a second time, about 1752, to Elizabeth Crawford. Colonel William Callaway died in Bedford Virginia in 1777, and is buried in the Callaway-Steptoe Cemetery. His first son James buried near his father, was also a man of great wealth who fought in the French and Indian Wars and the Revolutionary War. James, a close personal friend of General George Washington also built the first iron furnace south of the James River. This furnace played a big roll in the production of military supplies used in the revolution.
http://mediasvc.ancestry.com/image/7c3a9bfc-0fe2-4e5e-bb08-b1db2c506b22.jpg?Client=Trees&NamespaceID=1093
Depiction of Fort Boonesborough
Settled by Colonel Richard Callaway with Daniel Boone and others.
Our seventh great grand uncle.
Richard Callaway (c. 1724 – March 8, 1780) was an early settler of Kentucky which was now a state in the United States. With Daniel Boone, in 1775 he helped mark the Wilderness Road into central Kentucky, becoming one of the founders of Boonesborough, Kentucky. There, he took part in organizing the short-lived colony of Transylvania.
Richard Callaway was commissioned to survey a road into Kentucky for the Henderson Company in Feb 1775 which he did in company with Daniel Boone and a party of thirty persons. He returned to VA and brought families to Boonesborough Sept 1775. He was a member of the first Transylvania convention which met under a tree near Boonesborough May 23, 1775 and was later elected to the VA house of Burgesses 1777-79 from Kentucky county. He was granted the ferry privilege across the Kentucky River at Boonsborough Oct 1779 and was killed by Indians while working on a ferry boat in 1780.
Richard Callaway was a man destined to play an important role in Boone's life during the next few years. Callaway had joined Henderson's enterprise at about the same time as Boone and was in charge of hauling the goods and supplies to treaty grounds. The  son of a powerful landowning family in the Shenandoah Valley of Va. Callaway was ten years Boones' senior.
Upon their arrival at the selected site on the Kentucky River, 1 Apr 1775, Boone, Callaway and the other men immediately began construction of a fort. Located on the south bank of the river, the fort was considered by Henderson to be inadequate to accommodate the settlers to follow. So, he elected a site near the river bank about 300 yards from the original fort. Though the dimensions of this second or main fort are not known precisely, it is estimated to have been about 240 feet long and 180 feet wide. The gate opened on the side away from the river. There were blockhouses on each corner and cabins all along the walls. In the courtyard were three structures built in a row and connected to each other. The house and gun shop of Squire Boone occupied two of these. The other was the house of Col. Richard Callaway.
"Upon leaving his attractive surroundings in Virginia to come to the wilderness that was to become Kentucky, he was simply continuing his habit of pioneering. By reason of his experiences in the French and Indian Wars, in constructing and defending outposts forts, in the clearance and cultivation of frontier lands, and in the settlement and founding of New London, Colonel Callaway was, perhaps, the best prepared man with the Transylvania Company for the work in hand. As Colonel Callaway is never spoken as a member of the Transylvania Company it may be assumed that he joined them as commander of the military escort and as consultant to Colonel Henderson in drawing the plans for the fort that was to be built. The fort at Boonesborough apparently was built upon the most approved style of the times, since it succeeded in withstanding the most terrific siege of the pioneer days. This was not the hasty lodge thrown up on  arrival. It was a carefully planned construction. And Colonel Callaway had the experience in such matters. The "big fort" at Boonesborough was begun on April 22, 1775, on the south side of the Kentucky River, in what is now Madison County. Collins says it was finished on June 14, and "by compliment it is called Boonebourg or Boonesborough." Other stations or block houses were built at Harrodsburg, Boiling Springs and St. Asaph's. Colonel Henderson and his party arrived at Boonesborough on Thursday, April 20, 1775. In his diary he notes: "Sunday 23d passed the day without public worship as no place is provided for that purpose. Monday proceeded with the assistance of Capt. Boone & Col. Callaway in laying off lots, finished 19 besides one reserved round fine spring." The Transylvania Company or the Henderson Company opened a land office at Boonesborough and deeds were issued by the company as "Proprietors of the Colony of Transylvania." At the call of Colonel Henderson, representatives chosen by the people of Transylvania met on May 23, 1775, at Boonesborough and agreed upon, says Collins, "a proprietary government, and pass nine laws-the first legislative body west of the Allegheny and Cumberland Mountains." irbdgs_1originally submitted this to Draime Family Tree on 20 Jul 2011

http://mediasvc.ancestry.com/image/fa5cd43e-8704-4c47-9edb-d2ee40556640.jpg?Client=Trees&NamespaceID=1093
In 1776, two of his daughters, along with a daughter of Daniel Boone, were kidnapped outside Boonesborough by Native Americans. Callaway led one of parties in the famous rescue of the girls.
On Sunday, July 14, 1776, Indians captured three teenage girls from Boonesborough as they were floating in a canoe on the Kentucky River. They were Jemima, daughter of Daniel Boone, and Elizabeth and Frances, daughters of Colonel Richard Callaway. The Cherokee Hanging Maw led the Indians, a war party of two Cherokee and three Shawnee men. The settlement was thrown into a turmoil and a rescue party was organized by Callaway and Boone. Meanwhile the captors hurried the girls north toward the Shawnee towns across the Ohio River. The girls attempted to mark their trail until threatened by the Indians.
The third morning, as the Indians were building a fire for breakfast, the rescuers came up. "That's Father's gun!" cried Jemima, as one Indian was shot. He toppled into the fire and was seriously burned but not immediately killed. Two of the Native Americans later died from being wounded during the brief gunfight. The Indians retreated, leaving the girls to be escorted home.
Jemima soon married one of the rescuing party, Flanders Callaway. Elizabeth Callaway married Samuel Henderson and Frances, John Holder. The episode served to put the settlers in the Kentucky wilderness on guard and prevented their straying beyond the fort.

Elizabeth Callaway our seventh great grandmother married William Bramblett. William and Elizabeth were with the group that settled Boonesborough.   According to Reminiscences from the Life of Col. Cave Johnson (1760-1850), who was an eyewitness to the event, a rather large party was returning to VA from Bryant's Station, KY in the summer of 1779. The Rev. William (Bethel Baptist of Bedford) was mistaken for an Indian and shot by Aquila White  near the Cumberland River. KY Court records show William established Bramlett's Station 'on a branch of Stoner's Fork, a branch of Licking' this same year, 1779. There is a dearth of information on this family and some confusion as to which William Bramblett we are talking about.  Some accounts list Aquila White as William's son-in-law.  Some documentation on the Brambletts is lacking for this line.

Joseph James Callaway * (1680 - 1732)
is our 8th great grandfather
Elizabeth Callaway * married William Bramblett
daughter of Joseph James Callaway *
son of Elizabeth Callaway *
son of Henry, Sr. Bramblett *
son of Reuben Bramblett *
son of William Bramblett *
 son of William Bramblett *Jr.
 son of Fielding Bramblett *
 son of George Edward Bramblett *
 daughter of Walter Scott Bramblett *







Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Peter Caesar Alberti (1608-1655)

http://mediasvc.ancestry.com/image/6de42838-5b6e-4e73-a8db-ccb340a489be.jpg?Client=Trees&NamespaceID=1093
Just a note I have a DNA match to Alberti, although it is a low probability match.  Five percent of my DNA was low probability matches to various countries.  Here is his story:
Excerpts from "Long Island's First Italian, 1639-Peter Caesar Alberti By Berne A. Pyrke" 
On May 28, 1635, in the evening, the ship de Coninck David, Captain David Pietersen de Vries, skipper, mounting fourteen guns and with a crew of five and twenty men, dropped anchor far down the bay into which the River of the Prince Mauritius poured its water, gathered in the far mountains. Two days later a boat was lowered, into which clambered Captain de Vries and five of the crew. Without an inkling of the fate in store for them, the oarsmen bent to the task of propelling the heavy boat to Fort Amsterdam, five Dutch miles away. No one of the boatload other than the skipper himself was destined ever again to tread the deck of the de Coninck David or of any other vessel. We may guess the reason for this labored method of approaching the fort. Two years before, de Vries had had an unpleasant experience with Wouter Van Twiller, the director general, which still rankled. Van Twiller had searched his ship, confiscated a few beaver skins, charged de Vries with violation of a regulation of the colony, and at one point in the controversy, had ordered the guns of the fort trained on de Vries' vessel, and threatened its destruction. This was bitter medicine to be swallowed by the proud-spirited de Vries, outstanding navigator of the Netherlands and co-founder of the ill-fated Swanendael of the South River, the more unpalatable coming from Van Twiller, just risen from a clerkship in the office of the Company in Amsterdam. De Vries had lodged a complaint in the home office and Van Twiller had learned of it from Kiliaen Van Rensellaer, his uncle. Under the circumstances, it was prudent for de Vries to feel out the situation before bringing his ship within gun range of the fort. There was urgency, however, in the call. The de Coninck David was leaking dangerously, and facilities for repair being lacking in the Virginias, de Vries was forced to make the unplanned run up the coast to New Amsterdam in search of assistance. On arrival at the fort, de Vries found Van Twiller still holding forth, but weighted down with troubles and in a mellow and co-operative mood. Shortly before, he had sent an armed force to the South River to suppress an attempt at colonization by a band of Englishmen from Point Comfort, Virginia, who had seized the site of abandoned Fort Nassau. He had captured the intruders and brought them to New Amsterdam, but was a wit's end to dispose of his troublesome guests. In addition, the English were again becoming aggressive at the Fresh River. All in all, he welcomed the opportunity to consult the experienced de Vries, who was well versed in the ways of the English and had established cordial relations with the settlers in the Virginias. De Vries, deep in conference with Van Twiller, and not indifferent to Van Twiller's unexpected hospitality, decided to remain at the fort while he sent his crew back to the ship. Providentially for him, as it developed, he had found at the fort, one Flips Jansz, an experienced pilot formerly in his employ, and he engaged Flips to accompany the crew and to bring in the ship. To the decision to remain at the fort de Vries owed his life.
With the return journey nearly completed and the de Coninck David but a mile or two away, a violent thunderstorm arose which the small boat found difficult in weathering. Filling with water it went entirely out of control. Two of the panic-stricken crew, Frenchmen, went overboard in a desperate attempt to swim to the ship and were drowned. Towards nightfall two more jumped into the water in a hopeless effort to swim to shore and were seen no more. This left Flips Jansz and de Vries' boatswain alone in the boat. For two days and three nights, the boat was tossed back and forth, the plaything of the maddened waves. In the afternoon of the third day the boatswain announced that he would abandon the boat. Flips' resignation to Providence brought reward. Within a quarter of an hour of the disappearance of the boatswain the boat was cast through the heavy surf to the shore of Long Island. Mustering his remaining strength, Flips dragged himself five or six paces from the water and fell exhausted. Friendly Indians found him, carried him to their habitations, and brought word of the tragedy to the anxious de Vries. Earlier, de Vries, mystified by the failure of the ship to arrive, sent one of the company's yachts to bring in the vessel, and without further untoward incident this was accomplished.
 When the de Coninck David made contact with the wharf, one of the crew, without ceremony leaped ashore, and with quickening pace moved into its shadow. The name of this ex-sailor, for he was to be a lands-man henceforth, was Pietro Caesar Alberto. A native of Malamocco, Republic of Venice, the first of the Italian race to become a settler in New Netherlands, and probably in all of North America, and the progenitor-to- be of all in America of the name Alburtis of Burtis, names once very common on Long Island. This informal and unplanned entrance into New Netherlands of Alberto is veiled heavily in mystery. He had been tentatively identified, by Louis P. De Boer, a Specialist in Old World antecedents of early American settlers, as Guilo Caesare Alberti. He had been baptized in the parish church of San Luca on June 20, 1608, as the son of Andrea Alberti, Secretary of the Ducal Treasury of Venice, and Lady Veronica, his wife. An older son, Pietro, it seems, had died previously, and later, when another son was born, he was also named Pietro, but to avoid an ill omen, was baptized Guilo. Skepticism is in order when high birth is imputed to early settlers in New Amsterdam.
 In 1635 life was hard and drab, and the rewards of effort meager. In that feeble community, struggling to complete its first decade of existence. In fact, it was without doubt one of the last spots on the planet, where one should have searched for a scion of the proud House of Alberti. A notable family of Gothic or Lombardic origin, widely spread in the south of Europe in the disturbed days of the Holy Roman Empire. The New Amsterdam of 1635 was badly and arbitrarily governed, and largely neglected by its sponsor, the Dutch West India Company. Hedged about with savages of uncertain disposition and unpredictable behavior, and already feeling the uncomfortable pressure of the expanding and land-hungry Yankees to the north, they were also forced to meet an occasional aggression from the English well to the south.
 It was in that precise year that the New England Council granted to William, Earl of Stirling, all of Long Island, under the name of the Isle of Stirling, and accompanied the grant with a stern denunciation of the Dutch settlers as intruders. This may have seemed, at the time, as little more than an un-neighborly gesture, but it was deeply portentous of things to come. In a score and a half of years, Colonel Nicholls, an Englishman, with an ample fleet at his back; would, with one daft, utterly lawless, though bloodless strike, sponge all of New Netherlands from the map. Making effective the regal gift of other people's property to the Duke of York and Albany, at the hands of his delightfully generous brother, Charles II.
It is conceivable that Albert's engagement as a crew member on the de Coninck David was animated by a spirit of adventure and that his impulsive decision to throw in his fortune with New Amsterdam was an escape from unhappy, perhaps intolerable, relations with de Vries, who seemingly lacked enthusiasm for Italians. Once in a description of the Indians, de Vries remarked, "They are very vengeful, resembling the Italians." Thirst for adventure was an inborn quality of the Venetians, exemplified in its most bizarre form in the fabulous journeys of Marco Polo into the vastness of Asia, resulting in discoveries fully as momentous as those a little later in the New World of his fellow Italian, Columbus. In truth it was the enchanting tales of Polo, of the riches and wonders of distant China, which fired the imagination of the people of Europe and led indirectly to the discovery of America. The voyage of Captain de Vries in 1634 to South America was calculated to appeal to a spirit of adventure. The fourteen guns gleaming on the deck of the de Coninck David testified pointedly that this was not to be a pleasure cruise. The Thirty Years' War was in full swing and to the natural perils of a trans-Atlantic voyage of that day, were the added hazards of seas haunted by vessels of war, privateers, and pirates.
The outward voyage of two months to Guinea was commonplace enough for the circumstances of the period. The thirty planters were landed in their new home and set to work. After a month spent in organizing his new colony, which like the earlier one at Swanendael, was destined to a short life, de Vries sailed for Virginia in the expectation of recouping the cost of his voyage by exchanging the merchandise of his cargo for good Virginia tobacco leaf. Barely had he started when tidings came of dangers ahead. A refugee told of his escape from the Spaniards, "who had killed between 500 and 600 Englishmen". A little later, off the West Coast of Spain, de Vries encountered a fishing boat with a wood sloop in tow, filled with English refugees who had fled from the island of Tortuga to escape Spanish vengeance. The boats were so laden with human freight that they could not move and de Vries was importuned to take fifty of the unfortunates to a place of safety. De Vries was willing but his crew objected that in such a time it was dangerous to take on board so many strangers, outnumbering the crew two to one. After a long "discourse" in which de Vries sought to quiet the fears of the crew by pointing out that the strangers were not seamen but planters who would not run away with the ship, the views of the skipper prevailed and the Englishmen were taken on board. The reluctance of the crew is understandable in a time when piracy thinly disguised as privateering was one of the most popular, as well as rewarding, forms of patriotic enterprise.
 It is possible that Alberto may have been one of the leading insurgents in this attempt to flout the captain's authority, and the incident may have been the deciding factor in Alberto's determination to break the bond with de Vries. The event determined that de Vries' judgement was sound, as the refugees were safely landed in Virginia, where de Vries unloaded his cargo and after a month's delay pointed for New Amsterdam for repairs to his leaky vessel.
Whether Pietro Alberto was patrician or plebian, the story of his subsequent life in New Amsterdam, as it can be reconstructed in broken outline from the sparse records that have survived three centuries, has interest. There is no way of knowing the reception which Alberto was accorded when he suddenly injected himself into the life of New Amsterdam which is described as containing "a roving waterside population of sailors, longshoremen and traders, including many rough and shiftless characters". But if there was any lifting of eyebrows at the appearance of this unusual type of "foreigner", Alberto could have retorted, in the words of St. Paul, "I am a citizen of no mean city". For Malamocco had for centuries been one of the great powers of Europe, despite its small territory and a permanent population never exceeding 200,000. Dubbed the "Mistress of the Adriatic", it was much more than that. It dominated the carrying trade of the Mediterranean and was an important factor in the coastal trade along the Atlantic seaboard, and its mariners had no superiors anywhere.
 Alberto's first years in New Amsterdam are enshrouded in mystery. Nothing is known beyond the fact that he followed a humble but useful occupation to win his daily bread. We first hear of him in 1639 and in an interesting connection. De Vries was back in New Amsterdam, this time not on his own ship but in a trading vessel of the Company. Again he was bent on founding a colony, this time a patron-ship on Staten Island. Alberto was planning a reception for him, but not in the modern Grover Whalen manner. In January of 1639 Alberto jailed de Vries to compel payment of wages remaining unpaid from the 1635 voyage. De Vries, always belligerent, defended the suit on the ground that Alberto had deserted the ship - as indeed he had - and thereby forfeited the balance unpaid. Alberto was able to produce a witness to show justification for leaving, in that de Vries and twice on the voyage threatened to set Alberto ashore, once in Cayenne and later in Virginia. The court awarded Alberto ten guilders.
 In the same year there is evidence that Alberto had moved up a rung or two in the economic ladder, for on December 15, 1639, he entered a contract with Pieter Montfoort to make a plantation and build a house at the Waal-Bogt "Bay of the Foreigners". It was not until a year and a half later that Alberto secured a patent for the land from the Director General and council of New Amsterdam. Four years subsequently he received a second patent for an adjoining parcel. It is plain that Albert took possession before acquiring formal title. He may have entered into possession under an Indian purchase, but more likely as a squatter, counting upon securing a confirmatory grant form the Dutch authorities in due season. The two farms had a river frontage of about 700 feet, and with the land of Michael Picet, comprised the area now laying between Claremont and Hampden Avenues in modern Brooklyn.
It is a certainty that Alberto was one of the first occupants of land on the Long Island Shore of the East River, and he may well have been the first producer of tobacco on Long Island. It is a pleasing fancy that he derived his idea of becoming a tobacco grower and his understanding of the appropriate cultural practices during the month that the de Coninck David was berthed in the Virginias. The first patent for a "tobacco plantation" in New Netherlands was granted to Thomas Besher on November 28, 1639, a few weeks before Alberto made the contract with Montfoort to make a plantation and build a house. Besher's land was "on the beach of Long Island", probably at Gowanus. There is no way of determining whether Alberto or Besher was the first to make a tobacco crop, but surely Alberto was among the first planters of tobacco on Long Island. Three years before, Jacobus Van Curler was the patentee of an extensive area which became New Amersfoort and later Flatlands, but there is nothing at had to indicate that tobacco was a crop there. The next glimpse we get of Alberto was when he embarked on his greatest adventure, marrying a wife. Among the early marriage records of the Reformed Dutch Church in New Amsterdam is the following entry:1642 den 24 August, Peter Petro Albert, j.m. Van Venetian en Judith Jans, j.d. Van Amsterdam.
 The bride was the daughter of Jan Manje and his wife, Martha Chambart. The Manjes were probably Walloons, that ancient and interesting race of French-speaking provinces of southern Netherlands, many of whom having fled into the northern Netherlands to escape religious persecution were ready immigrants to New Netherlands. They constituted the first farmer element in the new province. Jan Manje has some claim on fame because of being one of the very few casualties of Kieft's insensate Indian War whose identity can be definitely established. As he lay dying from wounds received at the battle of Stamfor, Connecticut (1644), he availed himself of a soldier's privilege of making a nuncupative (oral) will by declaring his testamentary intentions to Councilor La Montage. La Montage, a distinguished physician, while opposed to the war, led the Dutch forces and was Manje's commander, and the appropriate person to receive, and later confirm in court, the dying man's last wishes. Both de Vries and La Montage had protested but without avail when Kieft had declared earlier his intention "to wipe the mouths of the savages".
In the twelve years following the marriage of Pietro and Judith, seven children were born to them. All were properly baptized in the New Amsterdam Dutch Church and given mainly Dutch names - Jan, Marles, Aert, Marritje, Francytie, Willem and Francyn. In selecting names for their offspring Pietro and Judith followed the Dutch custom in naming their first and second-born, Jan and Marles (Martha) for the maternal grandparents. If the practice was adhered to in the naming of the children later born, it may be inferred that the name of the Father of Pietro was Arturo or Gugliermo, rather than Andrea as suggested by De Boer. Of the seven children, Francytie died in infancy and Marles probably did not reach maturity. The early home of the Albertos was on the Heere Graft (Broad Street), from which they moved prior to 1643. This street in early days was "the favorite dwelling place of the quality", but it is not intended to suggest that the Albertos were of that rank. Both Pietro and Judith died shortly before November, 1655. From an allusion in the records to the "stewards of the Deat (dead) and of the Indian sufferers" in connection with the guardianship of the children, an inference has been drawn that they lost their lives in an Indian raid, to which their location on Waal-Bogt might have exposed them. There is no record of how the orphaned group were held together in their precarious situation, following the deaths of both parents. Fifteen years or more later, the records show that the daughters have married and the sons have moved from the Waal-Bogt up Newton Creek and become established at Maspat Kills. Contact with that English community has Anglicized the Dutch given names: Jan has become John, Aert Arthur, and Willem William. John, married Elizabeth, daughter of John Scudder, and early became a substantial property owner and a citizen of recognized standing. Alburtus Avenue in Queens is a present day reminder of the rank of the family in Newtown two and a half centuries ago. Arthur, married Elizabeth, daughter of James Way, a favorably known English-born Quaker, settled in the Foster's Meadows section of Hempstead about 1690 and became the progenitor of the Burtises who for decades were numerous in Hempstead and Oyster Bay. William, whose wife was Mehitabel, moved, about 1701, from Newtown to New Jersey, and eventually became lost to view.
The evolution of the family named Alberto, to the present day style Burtis, is not lacking in interest. The Dutch of the New Netherlands did not generally use surnames. When Pietro Caesar Alberto appeared among them, his full name, especially the cognomen, Alberto, gave them difficulty, and never received complete acceptance. In the records he is described in more than a score of styles, ranging from Pietro Malamocco to Peter Schoorsteenveger, the first indicative of his place of origin, and the second descriptive of his early vocation in New Amsterdam. These variations arose not from uncertainty on the part of Alberto as to his true name, but generally from the language predilection of the clerk, or sometimes the dominie, preparing the document or entering the record. In the court action against de Vries, Alberto was described as Cicero Pierre. It was doubtless a clerk trained in French who wrote the name Pierre. The substitution of Cicero for Caesar occurring in this instance and once five years later when Alberto receipted for his wife's share of her father's estate, cannot be explained except on the ground of the scrivener's confusing the names of the two classical writers, Caesar and Cicero. With the fondness of the Dutch for nicknames, it is a certainly that Alberto in the common speech of the community was called "Peiter the Italian", more formally Pieter Ceser, and occasionally Pieter Mallamacque. The Latin form "Albertus" is clearly a gift of the church through the classically trained Dominie Everardus Bogardus. In that period men attached to the learned professions and particularly individuals engrossed in the classics affected Latinized name forms, of which Everardus Bogardus is an example. Through the baptismal records of the New Amsterdam Dutch Church the Latinizing process at work on the name Alberto can readily be followed. At the time of his marriage, there is no touch of the Latin in the recording of his name as Peter Petro Alberto, but with the baptism of the first child the Latin becomes manifest. When Jan was baptized the father is entered as Petrus Petro Alberto. At the baptism of the second child, Marles, there is a slight backward step, as the father becomes Cesar Alberto, alias Pieter de Italian. Two years later Aert is baptized, and there for the first time the Latin Albertus appears, the father being described as Caesar Albertus. For more than thirty years thereafter and extending down to the second generation, the form "Albertus" is consistently adhered to in the church record. The last family entry was made on October 1, 1676, when Judith, the child of Jan Pietersen Bandt and Marie Pieters (Alberto) was baptized and the child's uncle was recorded as a witness under the name of "Willem Albertus". Dominie Bogardus may have been in a whimsical mood in applying the Latinizing technique to the Alberto family. Conscious that not a few Dutchmen, himself included, had dubbed themselves with Latin names, he may have concluded that it was fitting that the only real Latin among them should, regardless of cultural attainments, be accorded a similar dignity. The change from Albertus to Burtis was probably not in the beginning a matter of decision by the family. The Latin name Albertus was hard for the Dutch to handle, and at an early date it was occasionally the shortened, even in the records to Burtes, Burtos or Burtis. Eventually, the family conformed to the practice of the community, and in about the fourth generation the name Burtis was in nearly universal use. Member of the Burtis family intermarried with a considerable portion of the early Long Island families, including Baylis, Bedell, Carman, Clowes, de Bevois, Dorlom, Duryea, Foster, Fox, Hendrickson, Higbie, Linnington, Mott, Remsen, Van Nosterand, Way and Wycoff. The family speedily became known as Dutch as indeed it was, reflecting the preponderance of Dutch blood through intermarriage. At the normal rates of proliferation there should be in the United States at the present time, upwards of three thousand persons who embody the Alberto genes. Yet, probably not more than a score of them have awareness of their descent from the venturous, industrious, resolute Pietro Alberto.
 Three centuries ago, finding himself, by the whim of fate in an alien community, he adapted himself to his new environment, as if to the manner born. He conformed to the prevailing religion of the community, took to himself an Amsterdam wife, presented his children at the alter of the Dutch church for baptism in Dutch names, in short, became a Dutchman in everything but name and blood. But more important, he established himself as a worthy prototype of the hundreds of thousands of his countrymen. Who, in the intervening years followed his blazed trail to our shores and through their abundant gifts of body, mind and spirit, have contributed significantly to the development and well-being of this, their adopted land.
Pietro Caesar Alberto, Alberti, Albertus * (1608 - 1655)
is our 9th great grandfather
son of Pietro Caesar Alberto, Alberti, Albertus *
daughter of Jan John Albertis *
daughter of Elizabeth Alburtis *
daughter of Mary Jane Stewart *
son of Barbara Ann Reid *
daughter of John Read Long *
son of Nancy Jane Long *
daughter of Levi Springer *
daughter of Mary Mariah Springer *
son of Mary Lou Ella Stewart *


Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Estes Family

William Bramblett father of Fielding Bramblett Married Kitty Estes and brought another great line to our tree. 
The Estes are one of the great pioneer families of the United States. Numbered in their thousands they are are to be found in most parts of the country and a selection of their life histories would amply illustrate the history of America. They are to be found in the annals of the American Revolution, the expansion westwards and the Civil War and are representative of the whole social fabric from log cabin to Whitehouse! Though not among the great political families they produced a vice-presidential: candidate in Senator Estes Kefauver and a son-in-law on the bench to President Harrison, and they produced their own brand of tycoon in Billie Sol Estes. They were trail blazers, slave-owners, Quakers, Episcopalians, Presbyterians and Baptists. They drowned in frozen rivers and were captured by Indians as children. They fought on both sides in the Civil War and nursed their dying countrymen in that conflict. Their traditional Biblical names shared place with those of George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson and their family name, which is hardly known elsewhere, has become very much an American surname.

What we know of the English Estes is pieced together from a thorough examination of the parish registers and bishops transcripts available for Acrise, Ashford, Bucldand, Canterbury, Deal, Dover, Elnam, Folkestone, Guston, Hythe, London, Lydden, Margate, Nonington, Northbourne, Ringwould, Ripple, Rotherhithe, St Margarets at Cliff, Sandwich, Sholden, Waldershare, Walmer, West Langdon, Wingham and Wooton. The greatest linking was only achieved in recent years by an experienced English researcher, Donald Bowler, but other researchers have contributed in fitting the genealogical jigsaw together.
The Estes of Kent were described as a "maritime" family and this may explain why the earliest appearances of the name are found scattered about the southern coast from Morwenstow in Cornwall (1558) to Harwich in Essex.' There was probably a link between the Estes of Harwich and Deal, both centres of Walloon refugee settlement, as the registers of St Leonard, Deal, list the burial on 31 August 1621 of Hugh 'Estie' of Harwich who was bound from Germinie [Netherlands] in a ship called the Sion of London [Zion, a typical Protestant name]. It is clear from the records of St Leonard that all variants of the name were used interchangeably, the earliest instances being as follows: Eastes (1581), Este (1601), Estis (1618) and Eastis (1726). John Estye, who became a freeman of Canterbury by purchase on 27 June 1562, was a shearman or maker of shears, an occupation closely associated with the Walloon textile industry. He was no doubt the same John Estey or Estye who was a clothworker mentioned in Canterbury records between 1571 and 1593.
The first progenitor of the Deal family for whom we have reasonable records was Henry Este or Eagtes (b. about 1549 in Deal) who made his will as Henry Eastice, fisherman of Deal, on 13 April 1590. His widow Mary/Maria Rand Este (b. before 1575) was buried at St Leonards on 19 June 1601. The available evidence suggests that Henry and Mary had the following children:

1. Richard of Deal, born 1578
2. Henry of Deal, bapt. St Leonards 6 April 1581
3. Mary, bapt. St Leonards 15 January 158617, buried St Leonards 29 December 1587
4. Aron, bapt.. St Leonards 6 July 1589
Henry left his 'pinasse' (two masted vessel) and other property to be shared equally between his three sons Richard, Henry and Aron who were all very young. His executor was his brother Robert who was probably the founder of the Ringwould branch. Robert of Ringwould had links with Deal through his son Matthew, the marriage of his grand-daughter Ellen with Moses Estes, grandson of Richard of Deal, and the fact that some of his family became mariners, like the Deal family.

Robert of Ringwould married Ann Woodward at Sholden on 2 December 1591. He probably died about 1616. His widow Annie's will, dated 21 April 1630, was probated 9 June 1630 and gives certainty to the next generation. Their children were as follows:

1. Matthew, bapt. Sholden 11 June 1592
2. Sylvester,, bapt. Ringwould 26 September 1596
3. Alice, bapt. 26 March 1597, married at Ringwould, 28 October 1628 Thomas Beane
4. Matthew, born 1601, married at Deal 23 November 1620 Margaret Johnson
and buried Deal 4 June 1621
5. Robert, bapt. Ring-would 29 May 1603
6. Thornas, bapt. Ring-would 2 June 1605 Susan, bapt. Ringwould 30 October 1608
8. John, bapt. Ringwould 3 March 1610
9. ?, an infant who died in 1616
Most of the American families appear to descend from the eldest surviving child Sylvester and the fourth surviving child Robert, although the family of Richard Estes of Deal (born 1578) also had American connections. Several persons named Estes or one of its variants arrived in America before the Restoration of the Stuart monarchy in England.

A John Estes was brought to Virginia by Theodore Moyser in 1637 and another of that name was transported in 1659. Thomas Estes and his .wife Jane nee Jones were living in Westmoreland County, Virginia, in 1654 and James Estes or Estasse, probably a relation of Thomas, was living there in 1658. The early Estes could have come from the West Country rather than Kent though the most suitable candidate for Thomas would seem to be the second son of Robert of Ringwould, born in 1636. Sylvester Estes of Ringwould, sometime church warden, married Ellen Martin of Great Hardres on 24 November 1625. Ellen was of Waldershare according to her will of 1649. Sylvester had died before December 1667 when his daughter Ellen married. He left a large family:
1. Robert, Senior, of Waldershare,bapt. Ringwould 10 September 1626, buried Waldersha're 23 June 1692 (ancestor of the Estes of Waldershare)
2. Anne, bapt. Ring-would 25 November 1627
3. Silvester (a daughter), bapt. Ringwould 31 May 1629 (afterwards Mrs Nash)
4. Susan, bapt. Ringwould, 30 March 1631
5. Thomas, bapt. Ring7would 20 January 1633 (ancestor of Estes of Acrise, etc.)
6. Richard, bapt. Ring-would 5 October 1634 (ancestor of Estes and Eastes of Dover, West Langdon, St Margaret at Cliff and Guston)
7. Mary, bapt. Ringwould 2 October 1636
8. Anne, born in 1637
9. Nicholas of Wingham, bapt. Nonington 9 December 1638
10. Elizabeth, b. c.1640
11. Ellen, bapt. Nonington 11 December 1642, married at Deal, 23 December 1667, Moses Estes of Deal as his second Wife.
12. John, bapt. Nonington 29 December 1644
13 Abraham, born in 1647


The youngest child Abraham is an obvious candidate to be founder of the Virginia family. He was mentioned in his mother's will in 1649 and was a linen weaver in the old Walloon town of Sandwich, aged 25, when he married Ann widow of John Burton at Worth on 29 December 1672. Presumably Am died and he started a new life in Virginia. Family members who did not realise that Silvester was a woman could have assumed that Abraham was the youngest of seven brothers which may account for the American tradition that seven brothers had gone to America. The original claim was probably that Abraham was 'one of seven brothers' which later family members misconstrued to mean that they all came.

That Abraham, son of Sylvester of Ringwould, was the Virginian ancestor is partly supported by the fact that Abraham Estes of Virginia named his son Sylvester as his executor, a position usually filled by the eldest son who was invariably named after his paternal grandfather. Although most of the listings of the children of Abraham and Barbara Estes do not place Sylvester first the most logical arrangement is that worked out by Margaret M. Hayes of Illinois, based on a close study of the Virginia records. It is as follows:

1. Sylvester, b. c.1684, living in 1720
2. Samuel, b. c.1686, married Rebecca
3. Thomas, b.c.1688, d.1744, married c.1717 Ann Rogers who d. 1745
4. Mary, b. c.1690 (Mrs. Thomas Watkins)
5. Susanna, b. c.1692 (Mrs Thomas Poore)
6. Robert, b. c.1695, d. Lunenburg Co. 13 April 1775, married c.1725 Mary
7. Abraham, b.c.1697, d. before Feb. 1759, married (1) before 1717 Ann
(2) c. 1740 Elizabeth Jeeter who d. 1774
8. Richard, b. c.1699, d. Feb. 1774/5, married c.1727 Mary Yancy
9. John, b. c.1701, married Elizabeth
10. Elisha, b. c.1703, d. Henry Co. Virginia 1782 married before 1735 Mary Ann
11. Sarah, b. c.1705, unmarried in 1720
12 Moses, b. c.1710, d. 1788, married c.1731 Elizabeth.
13. Barbara, b. c.1712, d. unmarried 1729
This is an excerpt from a very long research paper of the Estes family found on Ancestry.com with this signature Email: shirleyjean@sbcglobal.net

Sylvester Estes (1522 - 1579)

is our 10th great grandfather



http://mediasvc.ancestry.com/image/bb210d1b-0636-4090-9594-cf807c743802.jpg?Client=Trees&NamespaceID=1093


Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Adam O'Brien




     Adam O'Brien, (1727-1836) was one of the first settlers in what is now WV;  he came to the West Fork of the Monongahela around 1756. In 1763; he defied the order of the King of England and was one of the early settlers west of the Blue Ridge Mountains. Sutton's "History of Braxton County and Central WV" states that a Capt. G.F. Taylor reported in a letter to a newspaper that Adam O'Brien was disappointed in a love affair with Isabel Burgoyne, the only daughter of Revolutionary General Burgoyne.  Whatever his reasons, Adam certainly wandered over a large portion of what was to become central WV.
     In the "Journal of the Braxton Historical Society" for September 1983, Virginia Carr states that Adam was living on the Potomac River in 1747 as a landowner.  Adam later served as an Indian scout and told an interviewer that he was at the battle of Point Pleasant in 1774. Adam was on a list of militia paid at Romney Virginia in 1775.
     Adam was granted 400 acres of land on the West Fork River in Harrison County and 400 acres on Lost Creek. F.J. Baxter's "Notes of Braxton County" states that Adam O'Brien assisted in making the first survey of that county in 1784.  Carr states that Adam moved all his family except his wife from Harrison County to what is now Braxton County WV in 1795, and they lived at the present site of Sutton, WV.
     Withers' "Chronicles of Border Warfare" states that Adam O'Brien was somewhat responsible for the Indian attack on Benjamin Carpenter family in 1798.  Withers’ alleges that the Indians followed trails blazed by O'Brien and discovered the Carpenter settlement.  Withers says that Adam was, "...rather an indifferent woodsman, incautiously blazed trails in several directions..." . This sounds unreasonable in light of the fact that Adam survived to over 100 years of age.
     About 1800, the O'Brien family moved to the West Fork of the Little Kanawha River in what is now Calhoun County WV.  Shortly after he moved to the West Fork, Adam and Mike Fink were attacked by Indians.  Fink was killed, but Adam escaped to return a few days later and bury Mike Fink and an Indian side by side.
     O'Brien had at least four wives and many children.  Icie Barsatti states that at one time, Adam had a wife and family on Steer Creek, Braxton County, Virginia (WV) and another on O'Brien Creek in what is now Clay County, WV.  His third wife died of exposure after she was evicted from a cabin on land claimed by O'Brien years before.
     In the May 1838 issue of "The Southern Literary Messenger" an anonymous writer reports and encounter with Adam O'Brien in Preston County VA (WV) at "Gandy's, far famed as being the worst house on the road."  The reporter told of a conversation with Adam during the course of an evening in which Adam stated that he was ninety three years old.  Adam was on his way to Clarksburg to "ferret out a land title".  Adam said that he had walked the distance of about 125 miles from Kanawha County at the rate of about 25 miles a day. Adam further told the reporter that his youngest child was a year old and that his oldest was 64.  He recounted his loss of his third wife because of exposure after they were evicted from a cabin while his wife was ill. "One of these here speculators had brought suit against me for my settlement, and what with bad management and hard swearing and perjury, he gained it."  "And the sheriff came one snowy day in January, with a writ of possession to turn me out, and out we went."  "I took my poor wife to an old cabin that had but half a roof on, and she never came out of it until she came out a corpse."
     Poet-historian, Colonel John L. Cole, once related a story told by Ephraim Bee, who had spent considerable time in a section, then a comparative wilderness, a neighbor to Adam O'Brien and Peter McCune. According to Bee, O'Brien's general complaint was of the advent of preachers, sheriffs, and lawyers into the area; he however made one exception, this was Rev. Barnabas Cook, who was one of the noted characters of his day. Bee related how a time came when the minister had to separate from his flock, and for the occasion, composed a valedictory hymn, in which he referred to all members of the congregation. In part, it ran as follows:

So fare-ye-well Adam O'Brien,
And good-by Peter McCune,
If one jump don't take us to heaven’
Light, and take a new jump from the moon.




Adam O Brien * (1727 - 1836) is my 5th great grandfather
Margaret Christina O Brien * (1767 - 1859)
Daughter of Adam O Brien and Katherine Christine Westbrook
Mary P McCune * (1785 - 1834)
Daughter of Margaret Christina O Brien and Peter McCune
Keziah Barnhouse * (1821 - 1887)
Daughter of Mary P McCune and Thomas Holsten Barnhouse
Rebecca Elizabeth Brannan * (1849 - 1926)
Daughter of Keziah Barnhouse and Lorenzo Dow Brannan
Charles William Lute * (1874 - 1905)
Son of Rebecca Elizabeth Brannan and Andrew Lute
Doran Edgar Lute * (1901 - 1982)
Son of Charles William Lute and Mary Lou Ella Stewart